Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Mary Giffin's avatar

You've captured beautifully my feelings about "withdrawal" from the Post. I still miss it, but we did give it up a while ago. Now I'm busy getting upset at the Times - while they do a good job in some articles and editorials, they've really fallen down on the job on key issues in terms of not asking the obvious questions that readers want to know about, or should know about, and failing to report relevant information. A recent example of the latter was the 4/5 article "A $1.8 Billion Business Built with A.I....". The Times researchers completely failed to (learn about?) cover a different side of the story, in which the FDA in February found the company MEDVI was making false statements about the drugs included in its program and had misleading and false advertising. It's hard to believe that the Times would not have found it, and harder to believe that if it was aware of it, that it would not report it. (See drugdiscoverytrends.com, April 4 article by Brian Buntz.)

Susie Wallin's avatar

I'm still hanging on out of stubbornness (I'm sure the day is coming when it will all be digital.) I need my eyeballs on paper for some of the day. I have a friend who passes along the Sunday NYT book review section, but I prefer what was the Post Books section. Mourning the loss of that.

7 more comments...

No posts

Ready for more?